Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 142(8): 998-1005, ago. 2014. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-728348

ABSTRACT

Background: Despite the importance of notifying and preventing adverse drug reactions (ADRs), they are under reported and their consequences are not adequately evaluated. Aim: To assess the impact of a pharmacovigilance system carried out by a pharmacist. Material and Methods: In an internal medicine service, the spontaneous report of ADRs was compared blindly with an active pharmacovigilance system in which a pharmacist detected, monitored and prevented ADRs. Results: A total of 1,196 patients was included. Of these 604 were hospitalized in intervened wards, where 50 suspected ADRs in 47 patients were reported. In non-intervened wards, only three ADRs were spontaneously reported. Therefore, the pharmacovigilance system significantly improved the detection and report of ADRs with a risk ratio of 15.4 (95% confidence intervals 4.8-49.1). Sixty six percent of ADRs were classified as severe. Antimicrobials were the main group of medications causing ADRs in 44% of reports. Forty three percent of ADRs were preventable and prolonged hospital stay by a mean of eight days. Conclusions: An active pharmacovigilance system carried out by pharmacists improves the detection of ADRs and promotes its prevention.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Pharmacists , Pharmacovigilance , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , Chile/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL